A general formulation of alternating direction methods

516 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1964, received 516 indexed citations. Written by Jim Douglas and James E. Gunn covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Mechanics of Materials and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Mechanics (293 citations), Numerical Analysis (117 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (94 citations). Published in Numerische Mathematik.

Countries where authors are citing A general formulation of alternating direction methods

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A general formulation of alternating direction methods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A general formulation of alternating direction methods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A general formulation of alternating direction methods more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A general formulation of alternating direction methods

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A general formulation of alternating direction methods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A general formulation of alternating direction methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01386093.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026