The NMDA antagonist MK-801 causes marked locomotor stimulation in monoamine-depleted mice

359 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1989, received 359 indexed citations. Written by Maria Carlsson and Arvid Carlsson covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (309 citations), Molecular Biology (130 citations) and Neurology (99 citations). Published in Journal of Neural Transmission.

Countries where authors are citing The NMDA antagonist MK-801 causes marked locomotor stimulation in monoamine-depleted mice

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The NMDA antagonist MK-801 causes marked locomotor stimulation in monoamine-depleted mice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The NMDA antagonist MK-801 causes marked locomotor stimulation in monoamine-depleted mice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The NMDA antagonist MK-801 causes marked locomotor stimulation in monoamine-depleted mice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The NMDA antagonist MK-801 causes marked locomotor stimulation in monoamine-depleted mice

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The NMDA antagonist MK-801 causes marked locomotor stimulation in monoamine-depleted mice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The NMDA antagonist MK-801 causes marked locomotor stimulation in monoamine-depleted mice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01258633.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026