Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity
- Authors
- John Law
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf01059830 →Countries where authors are citing Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity
This map shows the geographic impact of Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity
This network shows the impact of Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity.
About Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity
This paper, published in 1992, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by John Law covering the research area of Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Cultural Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (844 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (239 citations) and Strategy and Management (213 citations). Published in Systemic Practice and Action Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01059830.