The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior

658 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1987, received 658 indexed citations. Written by Sheldon Alexander and Marian N. Ruderman covering the research area of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Public Administration. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (400 citations), Sociology and Political Science (205 citations) and Strategy and Management (111 citations). Published in Social Justice Research.

Countries where authors are citing The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01048015.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026