Quantitative universality for a class of nonlinear transformations

2.3k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1978, received 2.3k indexed citations. Written by Mitchell J. Feigenbaum covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Geometry and Topology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.6k citations), Computer Networks and Communications (1.0k citations) and Mathematical Physics (468 citations). Published in Journal of Statistical Physics.

Countries where authors are citing Quantitative universality for a class of nonlinear transformations

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Quantitative universality for a class of nonlinear transformations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Quantitative universality for a class of nonlinear transformations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quantitative universality for a class of nonlinear transformations more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Quantitative universality for a class of nonlinear transformations

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Quantitative universality for a class of nonlinear transformations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Quantitative universality for a class of nonlinear transformations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01020332.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026