Efficient generalized conjugate gradient algorithms, part 1: Theory

478 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1991, received 478 indexed citations. Written by Yang Liu and C. Storey covering the research area of Numerical Analysis and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Numerical Analysis (402 citations), Computational Mechanics (235 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (203 citations). Published in Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications.

Countries where authors are citing Efficient generalized conjugate gradient algorithms, part 1: Theory

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Efficient generalized conjugate gradient algorithms, part 1: Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Efficient generalized conjugate gradient algorithms, part 1: Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Efficient generalized conjugate gradient algorithms, part 1: Theory more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Efficient generalized conjugate gradient algorithms, part 1: Theory

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Efficient generalized conjugate gradient algorithms, part 1: Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Efficient generalized conjugate gradient algorithms, part 1: Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00940464.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026