The multiplier method of Hestenes and Powell applied to convex programming

545 indexed citations
published 1973

Countries where authors are citing The multiplier method of Hestenes and Powell applied to convex programming

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The multiplier method of Hestenes and Powell applied to convex programming. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The multiplier method of Hestenes and Powell applied to convex programming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The multiplier method of Hestenes and Powell applied to convex programming more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The multiplier method of Hestenes and Powell applied to convex programming

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The multiplier method of Hestenes and Powell applied to convex programming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The multiplier method of Hestenes and Powell applied to convex programming.

About The multiplier method of Hestenes and Powell applied to convex programming

This paper, published in 1973, received 545 indexed citations . Written by R. T. Rockafellar covering the research area of Numerical Analysis and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Theory and Mathematics (186 citations), Numerical Analysis (158 citations) and Computational Mechanics (124 citations). Published in Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00934777.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026