Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00930023 →Countries where authors are citing Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment
This map shows the geographic impact of Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment
This network shows the impact of Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment.
About Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment
This paper, published in 1988, received 901 indexed citations . Written by Marc A. Zimmerman and Julian Rappaport covering the research area of General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (610 citations), Sociology and Political Science (220 citations) and Safety Research (131 citations). Published in American Journal of Community Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00930023.