The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis
- Journal
- Molecular Breeding
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00564200 →Countries where authors are citing The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis
This network shows the impact of The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis.
About The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis
This paper, published in 1996, received 2.1k indexed citations . Written by W. Powell, Michele Morgante, Michael K. Hanafey, Julie M. Vogel, Scott Tingey and Antoni Rafalski covering the research area of Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (1.6k citations), Genetics (846 citations) and Molecular Biology (539 citations). Published in Molecular Breeding.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00564200.