Genetic control of multiple molecular forms of enzymes in plants: A review
- Authors
- John G. Scandalios
- Journal
- Biochemical Genetics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00485973 →Countries where authors are citing Genetic control of multiple molecular forms of enzymes in plants: A review
This map shows the geographic impact of Genetic control of multiple molecular forms of enzymes in plants: A review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Genetic control of multiple molecular forms of enzymes in plants: A review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genetic control of multiple molecular forms of enzymes in plants: A review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Genetic control of multiple molecular forms of enzymes in plants: A review
This network shows the impact of Genetic control of multiple molecular forms of enzymes in plants: A review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Genetic control of multiple molecular forms of enzymes in plants: A review.
About Genetic control of multiple molecular forms of enzymes in plants: A review
This paper, published in 1969, received 509 indexed citations . Written by John G. Scandalios covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (371 citations), Molecular Biology (213 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (117 citations). Published in Biochemical Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00485973.