The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30

534 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1996, received 534 indexed citations. Written by Madeleine King covering the research area of Oncology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (333 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (200 citations) and Surgery (126 citations). Published in Quality of Life Research.

Countries where authors are citing The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00439229.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026