Cell wall regeneration and cell division in isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts
- Authors
- Toshiyuki NagataItaru Takebe
- Journal
- Planta
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00385097 →Countries where authors are citing Cell wall regeneration and cell division in isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts
This map shows the geographic impact of Cell wall regeneration and cell division in isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cell wall regeneration and cell division in isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cell wall regeneration and cell division in isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cell wall regeneration and cell division in isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts
This network shows the impact of Cell wall regeneration and cell division in isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cell wall regeneration and cell division in isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts.
About Cell wall regeneration and cell division in isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts
This paper, published in 1970, received 379 indexed citations . Written by Toshiyuki Nagata and Itaru Takebe covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (295 citations), Molecular Biology (291 citations), Biotechnology (51 citations), Cell Biology (26 citations) and Food Science (23 citations). Published in Planta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00385097.