Relative growth rates and the grazing optimization hypothesis

318 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1981, received 318 indexed citations. Written by David W. Hilbert, David M. Swift, James K. Detling and M. I. Dyer covering the research area of Forestry, Ecology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (198 citations), Ecology (114 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (102 citations). Published in Oecologia.

Countries where authors are citing Relative growth rates and the grazing optimization hypothesis

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Relative growth rates and the grazing optimization hypothesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Relative growth rates and the grazing optimization hypothesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Relative growth rates and the grazing optimization hypothesis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Relative growth rates and the grazing optimization hypothesis

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Relative growth rates and the grazing optimization hypothesis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Relative growth rates and the grazing optimization hypothesis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00344645.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026