Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts

606 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1973, received 606 indexed citations. Written by George Lakoff covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Language and Linguistics (204 citations), Artificial Intelligence (187 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (125 citations). Published in Journal of Philosophical Logic.

Countries where authors are citing Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00262952.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026