The gradient theory of phase transitions and the minimal interface criterion
- Authors
- Luciano Modica
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00251230 →Countries where authors are citing The gradient theory of phase transitions and the minimal interface criterion
This map shows the geographic impact of The gradient theory of phase transitions and the minimal interface criterion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The gradient theory of phase transitions and the minimal interface criterion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The gradient theory of phase transitions and the minimal interface criterion more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The gradient theory of phase transitions and the minimal interface criterion
This network shows the impact of The gradient theory of phase transitions and the minimal interface criterion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The gradient theory of phase transitions and the minimal interface criterion.
About The gradient theory of phase transitions and the minimal interface criterion
This paper, published in 1987, received 635 indexed citations . Written by Luciano Modica covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Atmospheric Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Theory and Mathematics (363 citations), Applied Mathematics (264 citations) and Materials Chemistry (226 citations). Published in Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00251230.