Detection of 98% of DMD/BMD gene deletions by polymerase chain reaction
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Alan H. Beggs
- Journal
- Human Genetics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00205170 →Countries where authors are citing Detection of 98% of DMD/BMD gene deletions by polymerase chain reaction
This map shows the geographic impact of Detection of 98% of DMD/BMD gene deletions by polymerase chain reaction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Detection of 98% of DMD/BMD gene deletions by polymerase chain reaction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Detection of 98% of DMD/BMD gene deletions by polymerase chain reaction more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Detection of 98% of DMD/BMD gene deletions by polymerase chain reaction
This network shows the impact of Detection of 98% of DMD/BMD gene deletions by polymerase chain reaction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Detection of 98% of DMD/BMD gene deletions by polymerase chain reaction.
About Detection of 98% of DMD/BMD gene deletions by polymerase chain reaction
This paper, published in 1990, received 578 indexed citations . Written by Alan H. Beggs covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Physiology and Genetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (535 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (165 citations), Genetics (114 citations), Genetics (96 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (79 citations). Published in Human Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00205170.