How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits
Abstract
loading...
About
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00143739 →Countries where authors are citing How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits
This map shows the geographic impact of How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits more than expected).
Fields of papers citing How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits
This network shows the impact of How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00143739.