The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: Self-Focusing and Wave Collapse
- Authors
- Catherine SulemPirre-Louis Sulem
- Journal
- Applied Mathematical Sciences
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/b98958 →Countries where authors are citing The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: Self-Focusing and Wave Collapse
This map shows the geographic impact of The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: Self-Focusing and Wave Collapse. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: Self-Focusing and Wave Collapse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: Self-Focusing and Wave Collapse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: Self-Focusing and Wave Collapse
This network shows the impact of The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: Self-Focusing and Wave Collapse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: Self-Focusing and Wave Collapse.
About The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: Self-Focusing and Wave Collapse
This paper, published in 2004, received 760 indexed citations . Written by Catherine Sulem and Pirre-Louis Sulem covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (458 citations), Mathematical Physics (371 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (280 citations). Published in Applied Mathematical Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/b98958.