Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects
- Authors
- Elizabeth A. Bernays
- Journal
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/b102508 →Countries where authors are citing Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects
This map shows the geographic impact of Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects
This network shows the impact of Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects.
About Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects
This paper, published in 1994, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Elizabeth A. Bernays covering the research area of Plant Science, Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Insect Science (868 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (648 citations) and Plant Science (503 citations). Published in Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/b102508.