A review of modelling techniques for floating offshore wind turbines
- Journal
- Wind Energy
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/we.2701 →Countries where authors are citing A review of modelling techniques for floating offshore wind turbines
This map shows the geographic impact of A review of modelling techniques for floating offshore wind turbines. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A review of modelling techniques for floating offshore wind turbines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A review of modelling techniques for floating offshore wind turbines more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A review of modelling techniques for floating offshore wind turbines
This network shows the impact of A review of modelling techniques for floating offshore wind turbines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A review of modelling techniques for floating offshore wind turbines.
About A review of modelling techniques for floating offshore wind turbines
This paper, published in 2021, received 151 indexed citations . Written by Jimmy Murphy, Vikram Pakrashi, Amy Robertson and Cian Desmond covering the research area of Aerospace Engineering, Ocean Engineering and Computational Mechanics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ocean Engineering (99 citations), Aerospace Engineering (83 citations) and Computational Mechanics (69 citations). Published in Wind Energy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/we.2701.