Nature-culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality
- Authors
- Megan BangAnanda Marin
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/tea.21204 →Countries where authors are citing Nature-culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality
This map shows the geographic impact of Nature-culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nature-culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature-culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nature-culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality
This network shows the impact of Nature-culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nature-culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality.
About Nature-culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality
This paper, published in 2015, received 178 indexed citations . Written by Megan Bang and Ananda Marin covering the research area of Cultural Studies, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (106 citations), Sociology and Political Science (55 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (33 citations). Published in Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/tea.21204.