A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics

822 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2003, received 822 indexed citations. Written by Robert J. David and Shin‐Kap Han covering the research area of Strategy and Management, Safety Research and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (483 citations), Management Information Systems (246 citations) and Accounting (176 citations). Published in Strategic Management Journal.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/smj.359 →

Countries where authors are citing A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/smj.359.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026