Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning

601 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2009, received 601 indexed citations. Written by Brian K. Lee, Justin Lessler and Elizabeth A. Stuart covering the research area of Statistics and Probability. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics and Probability (357 citations), Economics and Econometrics (165 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (44 citations). Published in Statistics in Medicine.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/sim.3782 →

Countries where authors are citing Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sim.3782.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026