A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors

867 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2004, received 867 indexed citations. Written by Jonathan P. Tyrer, Stephen W. Duffy and Jack Cuzick covering the research area of Genetics and Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Genetics (557 citations), Oncology (527 citations) and Cancer Research (262 citations). Published in Statistics in Medicine.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/sim.1668 →

Countries where authors are citing A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sim.1668.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026