The current state and future outlook of rescue robotics

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 224 indexed citations. Written by Jeffrey Delmerico, Stefano Mintchev, Alessandro Giusti, Boris Gromov, Kamilo Melo, Tomislav Horvat, César Cadena, Marco Hutter, Auke Jan Ijspeert and Dario Floreano covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering, Ocean Engineering and Aerospace Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Aerospace Engineering (100 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (99 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (70 citations). Published in Journal of Field Robotics.

Countries where authors are citing The current state and future outlook of rescue robotics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The current state and future outlook of rescue robotics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The current state and future outlook of rescue robotics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The current state and future outlook of rescue robotics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The current state and future outlook of rescue robotics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The current state and future outlook of rescue robotics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The current state and future outlook of rescue robotics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/rob.21887.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026