Survey of advances in guidance, navigation, and control of unmanned rotorcraft systems

483 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2012, received 483 indexed citations. Written by Farid Kendoul covering the research area of Aerospace Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Aerospace Engineering (316 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (256 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (202 citations). Published in Journal of Field Robotics.

Countries where authors are citing Survey of advances in guidance, navigation, and control of unmanned rotorcraft systems

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Survey of advances in guidance, navigation, and control of unmanned rotorcraft systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Survey of advances in guidance, navigation, and control of unmanned rotorcraft systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Survey of advances in guidance, navigation, and control of unmanned rotorcraft systems more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Survey of advances in guidance, navigation, and control of unmanned rotorcraft systems

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Survey of advances in guidance, navigation, and control of unmanned rotorcraft systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Survey of advances in guidance, navigation, and control of unmanned rotorcraft systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/rob.20414.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026