Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism

292 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2018, received 292 indexed citations. Written by Brian Schaffner, Matthew C. MacWilliams and Tatishe Nteta covering the research area of Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (186 citations), Political Science and International Relations (173 citations) and Gender Studies (102 citations). Published in Political Science Quarterly.

Countries where authors are citing Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/polq.12737.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper The Blockchain as a Software Connector Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Functional and Genomic Variation between Human-Derived Isolates of Lachnospiraceae Reveals Inter- and Intra-Species Diversity Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Natural Disasters, Household Welfare, and Resilience: Evidence from Rural Vietnam Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Molten salts database for energy applications Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Outcomes after Angiography with Sodium Bicarbonate and Acetylcysteine Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper DEA-Net: Single Image Dehazing Based on Detail-Enhanced Convolution and Content-Guided Attention Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper European Stroke Organisation (ESO)- European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Multivariate adaptive regression splines for analysis of geotechnical engineering systems Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Why Synchrony Matters during Mother-Child Interactions: A Systematic Review Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Extensions of Korpelevich's extragradient method for the variational inequality problem in Euclidean space
Rankless by CCL
2026