Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation
- Journal
- Hydrological Processes
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6989 →Countries where authors are citing Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation
This map shows the geographic impact of Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation
This network shows the impact of Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation.
About Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation
This paper, published in 2008, received 496 indexed citations . Written by Hoshin V. Gupta, Thorsten Wagener and Yuqiong Liu covering the research area of Water Science and Technology, Ocean Engineering and Environmental Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Water Science and Technology (430 citations), Global and Planetary Change (330 citations) and Environmental Engineering (238 citations). Published in Hydrological Processes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6989.