Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes

540 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2003, received 540 indexed citations. Written by Dawen Yang, Shinjiro Kanae, Taikan Oki, Toshio Koike and Katumi MUSIAKE covering the research area of Soil Science, Water Science and Technology and Earth-Surface Processes. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Soil Science (449 citations), Water Science and Technology (255 citations) and Ecology (223 citations). Published in Hydrological Processes.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1441 →

Countries where authors are citing Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1441.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026