Recommendations on practice of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) testing

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 401 indexed citations. Written by David Yarnitsky, Didier Bouhassira, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Roger B. Fillingim, Michal Granot, Per Hansson, Ruth Landau, Serge Marchand, Dagfinn Matre and Kristian Bernhard Nilsen covering the research area of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Physiology and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (249 citations), Pharmacology (248 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (113 citations). Published in European Journal of Pain.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/ejp.605 →

Countries where authors are citing Recommendations on practice of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) testing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Recommendations on practice of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) testing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Recommendations on practice of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) testing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Recommendations on practice of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) testing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Recommendations on practice of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) testing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Recommendations on practice of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) testing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Recommendations on practice of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) testing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/ejp.605.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026