A BOILED‐Egg To Predict Gastrointestinal Absorption and Brain Penetration of Small Molecules

1.7k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2016, received 1.7k indexed citations. Written by Antoine Daina and Vincent Zoete covering the research area of Oncology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (793 citations), Molecular Biology (612 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (582 citations). Published in ChemMedChem.

Countries where authors are citing A BOILED‐Egg To Predict Gastrointestinal Absorption and Brain Penetration of Small Molecules

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A BOILED‐Egg To Predict Gastrointestinal Absorption and Brain Penetration of Small Molecules. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A BOILED‐Egg To Predict Gastrointestinal Absorption and Brain Penetration of Small Molecules with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A BOILED‐Egg To Predict Gastrointestinal Absorption and Brain Penetration of Small Molecules more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A BOILED‐Egg To Predict Gastrointestinal Absorption and Brain Penetration of Small Molecules

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A BOILED‐Egg To Predict Gastrointestinal Absorption and Brain Penetration of Small Molecules. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A BOILED‐Egg To Predict Gastrointestinal Absorption and Brain Penetration of Small Molecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201600182.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026