Sex differences in skeletal muscle fiber types: A meta‐analysis

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 83 indexed citations. Written by James L. Nuzzo covering the research area of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (34 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (34 citations) and Cell Biology (17 citations). Published in Clinical Anatomy.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/ca.24091 →

Countries where authors are citing Sex differences in skeletal muscle fiber types: A meta‐analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sex differences in skeletal muscle fiber types: A meta‐analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sex differences in skeletal muscle fiber types: A meta‐analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sex differences in skeletal muscle fiber types: A meta‐analysis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Sex differences in skeletal muscle fiber types: A meta‐analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Sex differences in skeletal muscle fiber types: A meta‐analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sex differences in skeletal muscle fiber types: A meta‐analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/ca.24091.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026