Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice
- Authors
- H.E.J. Bos-Brouwers
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/bse.652 →Countries where authors are citing Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice
This map shows the geographic impact of Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice
This network shows the impact of Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice.
About Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice
This paper, published in 2009, received 592 indexed citations . Written by H.E.J. Bos-Brouwers covering the research area of Strategy and Management, Marketing and Business and International Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (419 citations), Marketing (397 citations) and Business and International Management (109 citations). Published in Business Strategy and the Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/bse.652.