Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 989 indexed citations. Written by Magali A. Delmas and Michael W. Toffel covering the research area of Strategy and Management and Marketing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (787 citations), Marketing (700 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (143 citations). Published in Business Strategy and the Environment.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/bse.409 →

Countries where authors are citing Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/bse.409.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026