ESG controversies and corporate governance: Evidence from board size
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/bse.3697 →Countries where authors are citing ESG controversies and corporate governance: Evidence from board size
This map shows the geographic impact of ESG controversies and corporate governance: Evidence from board size. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ESG controversies and corporate governance: Evidence from board size with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ESG controversies and corporate governance: Evidence from board size more than expected).
Fields of papers citing ESG controversies and corporate governance: Evidence from board size
This network shows the impact of ESG controversies and corporate governance: Evidence from board size. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ESG controversies and corporate governance: Evidence from board size.
About ESG controversies and corporate governance: Evidence from board size
This paper, published in 2024, received 49 indexed citations . Written by Sirimon Treepongkaruna, Khine Kyaw and Pornsit Jiraporn covering the research area of Strategy and Management, Accounting and Marketing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (35 citations), Accounting (22 citations) and Marketing (17 citations). Published in Business Strategy and the Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/bse.3697.