Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/bse.2834 →Countries where authors are citing Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review
This map shows the geographic impact of Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review
This network shows the impact of Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review.
About Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review
This paper, published in 2021, received 343 indexed citations . Written by Nathalia Suchek, Cristina Fernandes, Sascha Kraus, Matthias Filser and Helena Sjögrén covering the research area of Strategy and Management, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Marketing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (254 citations), Marketing (173 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (68 citations), Business and International Management (64 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (47 citations). Published in Business Strategy and the Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/bse.2834.