Andragogy and Self‐Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory
- Authors
- Sharan B. Merriam
- Journal
- New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/ace.3 →Countries where authors are citing Andragogy and Self‐Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory
This map shows the geographic impact of Andragogy and Self‐Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andragogy and Self‐Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andragogy and Self‐Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Andragogy and Self‐Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory
This network shows the impact of Andragogy and Self‐Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Andragogy and Self‐Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory.
About Andragogy and Self‐Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory
This paper, published in 2001, received 733 indexed citations . Written by Sharan B. Merriam covering the research area of Human Factors and Ergonomics and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (418 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (135 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (77 citations). Published in New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/ace.3.