A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence
- Journal
- Geophysical Research Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/2016gl072012 →Countries where authors are citing A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence
This map shows the geographic impact of A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence
This network shows the impact of A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence.
About A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence
This paper, published in 2017, received 302 indexed citations . Written by Reto Knutti, Jan Sedláčék, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Ruth Lorenz, Erich Fischer and Veronika Eyring covering the research area of Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (265 citations), Atmospheric Science (198 citations) and Water Science and Technology (46 citations). Published in Geophysical Research Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/2016gl072012.