Revision of the EPICA Dome C CO 2 record from 800 to 600 kyr before present

514 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2014, received 514 indexed citations. Written by Bernhard Bereiter, Sarah Eggleston, J. H. M. M. Schmitt, Christoph Nehrbass‐Ahles, Thomas F. Stocker, Hubertus Fischer, Sepp Kipfstuhl and J. Chappellaz covering the research area of Geophysics and Atmospheric Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atmospheric Science (469 citations), Environmental Chemistry (157 citations) and Ecology (131 citations). Published in Geophysical Research Letters.

Countries where authors are citing Revision of the EPICA Dome C CO 2 record from 800 to 600 kyr before present

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Revision of the EPICA Dome C CO 2 record from 800 to 600 kyr before present. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Revision of the EPICA Dome C CO 2 record from 800 to 600 kyr before present with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revision of the EPICA Dome C CO 2 record from 800 to 600 kyr before present more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Revision of the EPICA Dome C CO 2 record from 800 to 600 kyr before present

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Revision of the EPICA Dome C CO 2 record from 800 to 600 kyr before present. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Revision of the EPICA Dome C CO 2 record from 800 to 600 kyr before present.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/2014gl061957.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026