Zhe Nie

66 total papers · 548 total citations
34 papers, 417 citations indexed

About

Zhe Nie is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Zhe Nie has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 417 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 10 papers in Information Systems and 9 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Zhe Nie's work include Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (5 papers), Neural Networks Stability and Synchronization (5 papers) and Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (5 papers). Zhe Nie is often cited by papers focused on Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (5 papers), Neural Networks Stability and Synchronization (5 papers) and Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (5 papers). Zhe Nie collaborates with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and Germany. Zhe Nie's co-authors include Li-Hua Gong, Shasha Yu, Nanrun Zhou, Haibo Yi, Xiaojun Wen, Yueping Li, Eric Ke Wang, Jianwen Feng, Antonia Dimitrakopoulou‐Strauss and Leyun Pan and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Access, Neurocomputing and Cells.

In The Last Decade

Zhe Nie

29 papers receiving 400 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Zhe Nie	186	132	76	58	40	34	417
Ramakrishnan Kannan	106 0.6×	153 1.2×	67 0.9×	90 1.6×	42 1.1×	50	473
Nordin Zakaria	63 0.3×	153 1.2×	66 0.9×	73 1.3×	29 0.7×	68	406
Kurunandan Jain	161 0.9×	152 1.2×	133 1.8×	75 1.3×	12 0.3×	40	421
Ling Wang	208 1.1×	162 1.2×	55 0.7×	19 0.3×	12 0.3×	40	375
Bo Hu	133 0.7×	286 2.2×	62 0.8×	77 1.3×	10 0.3×	48	490
Michael Hofmann	136 0.7×	68 0.5×	85 1.1×	22 0.4×	51 1.3×	29	391
Wei Xiong	163 0.9×	118 0.9×	121 1.6×	31 0.5×	104 2.6×	44	484
Bin Gao	153 0.8×	121 0.9×	160 2.1×	90 1.6×	18 0.5×	41	445
Monica Borda	171 0.9×	85 0.6×	54 0.7×	26 0.4×	40 1.0×	64	407
Junwei Yang	76 0.4×	132 1.0×	34 0.4×	34 0.6×	12 0.3×	35	376

Countries citing papers authored by Zhe Nie

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zhe Nie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zhe Nie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zhe Nie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zhe Nie

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zhe Nie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zhe Nie. The network helps show where Zhe Nie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Zhe Nie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Zhe Nie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Zhe Nie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Zhe Nie. Zhe Nie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact