Yvette Drew

6.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
68 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Yvette Drew is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology and Reproductive Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Yvette Drew has authored 68 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 56 papers in Oncology, 32 papers in Molecular Biology and 16 papers in Reproductive Medicine. Recurrent topics in Yvette Drew's work include PARP inhibition in cancer therapy (45 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (20 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (15 papers). Yvette Drew is often cited by papers focused on PARP inhibition in cancer therapy (45 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (20 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (15 papers). Yvette Drew collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Yvette Drew's co-authors include Nicola J. Curtin, Alice Bradbury, Rebecca Kristeleit, Jonathan A. Ledermann, Ruth Plummer, Zdeněk Hostomský, Stuart Rundle, Asima Mukhopadhyay, Richard J. Edmondson and Suzanne Kyle and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

In The Last Decade

Yvette Drew

68 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

DNA damage response inhibitors in cancer therapy: lessons... 2024 2026 2025 2024 10 20 30 40 50

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Yvette Drew United Kingdom 22 1.8k 1.4k 625 333 328 68 2.3k
Maria Orr United Kingdom 12 1.3k 0.7× 794 0.6× 702 1.1× 473 1.4× 156 0.5× 16 1.8k
Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson United States 15 839 0.5× 633 0.5× 405 0.6× 113 0.3× 164 0.5× 55 1.3k
Marsela Braunstein Canada 11 450 0.3× 638 0.5× 485 0.8× 82 0.2× 320 1.0× 15 1.4k
Amèlie Renaud United States 6 2.0k 1.1× 1.7k 1.2× 246 0.4× 265 0.8× 262 0.8× 7 2.4k
Patrick G. Pilié United States 13 1.1k 0.6× 1.1k 0.8× 91 0.1× 135 0.4× 227 0.7× 43 1.8k
Janneke E. Jaspers Netherlands 15 1.5k 0.9× 1.4k 1.0× 154 0.2× 388 1.2× 208 0.6× 17 2.0k
Elizabeth Ruth Plummer United Kingdom 19 961 0.5× 836 0.6× 123 0.2× 152 0.5× 137 0.4× 69 1.3k
Bose Kochupurakkal United States 16 810 0.5× 1.0k 0.7× 100 0.2× 97 0.3× 117 0.4× 44 1.4k
Tomoko Freshwater United States 13 1.0k 0.6× 783 0.6× 112 0.2× 73 0.2× 226 0.7× 27 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Yvette Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Yvette Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yvette Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yvette Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Yvette Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yvette Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yvette Drew. The network helps show where Yvette Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Yvette Drew

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Yvette Drew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Yvette Drew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Yvette Drew. Yvette Drew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jamieson, Amy, Dawn R. Cochrane, J. Maxwell Douglas, et al.. (2024). Targeted and Shallow Whole-Genome Sequencing Identifies Therapeutic Opportunities in p53abn Endometrial Cancers. Clinical Cancer Research. 30(11). 2461–2474. 11 indexed citations
2.
Drew, Yvette, Frank T. Zenke, & Nicola J. Curtin. (2024). DNA damage response inhibitors in cancer therapy: lessons from the past, current status and future implications. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 24(1). 19–39. 54 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Rae, S., E. Ruth Plummer, Linda Hogarth, et al.. (2023). Prevalence of mutations in common tumour types in Northern England and comparable utility of national and international Trial Finders. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 149(18). 16355–16363. 1 indexed citations
6.
Saha, Sweta Sharma, Alice Bradbury, R.L. Robinson, et al.. (2021). Genomic, Transcriptomic, and Functional Alterations in DNA Damage Response Pathways as Putative Biomarkers of Chemotherapy Response in Ovarian Cancer. Cancers. 13(6). 1420–1420. 8 indexed citations
7.
Morrison, Jo, Janos Balega, Lynn Buckley, et al.. (2021). British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) uterine cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 270. 50–89. 76 indexed citations
8.
Tomaszewska‐Kiecana, Monika, Rodryg Ramlau, Yvette Drew, et al.. (2021). Pharmacokinetics and safety of rucaparib in patients with advanced solid tumors and hepatic impairment. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. 88(2). 259–270. 11 indexed citations
9.
Robinson, Harry M., et al.. (2020). Enteric Type Bartholin Gland Adenocarcinoma: An Unusual Variant of a Rare Neoplasm. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 40(2). 190–195. 5 indexed citations
10.
Ramalingam, Sundar, Juanita Lopez, Morten Mau‐Sørensen, et al.. (2019). OA02.05 First-In-Human Phase 1/2 Trial of Anti-AXL Antibody–Drug Conjugate (ADC) Enapotamab Vedotin (EnaV) in Advanced NSCLC. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 14(10). S209–S209. 12 indexed citations
11.
Curtin, Nicola J., Yvette Drew, & Sweta Sharma Saha. (2019). Why BRCA mutations are not tumour-agnostic biomarkers for PARP inhibitor therapy. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. 16(12). 725–726. 20 indexed citations
12.
Kristeleit, Rebecca, Geoffrey I. Shapiro, Howard A. Burris, et al.. (2017). A Phase I–II Study of the Oral PARP Inhibitor Rucaparib in Patients with Germline BRCA1/2 -Mutated Ovarian Carcinoma or Other Solid Tumors. Clinical Cancer Research. 23(15). 4095–4106. 186 indexed citations
13.
Vergote, Ignace, Emma Dean, Ulrik Lassen, et al.. (2017). A phase IIa study of tisotumab vedotin (HuMax®-TF-ADC) in patients with relapsed, recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer. Annals of Oncology. 28. v330–v331. 6 indexed citations
14.
Helali, Aya El, Ruth Plummer, Gordon C. Jayson, et al.. (2017). A phase I dose-escalation study of the novel peptide ALM201 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours. Annals of Oncology. 28. v128–v128. 5 indexed citations
15.
Ledermann, Jonathan A., Yvette Drew, & Rebecca Kristeleit. (2016). Homologous recombination deficiency and ovarian cancer. European Journal of Cancer. 60. 49–58. 193 indexed citations
17.
Drew, Yvette. (2015). The development of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: from bench to bedside. British Journal of Cancer. 113(S1). S3–S9. 36 indexed citations
19.
Mukhopadhyay, Asima, Ahmed Elattar, Sarah Wilkinson, et al.. (2010). Development of a Functional Assay for Homologous Recombination Status in Primary Cultures of Epithelial Ovarian Tumor and Correlation with Sensitivity to Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors. Clinical Cancer Research. 16(8). 2344–2351. 207 indexed citations
20.
Rozanska, Agata, Huw D. Thomas, Evan A. Mulligan, et al.. (2009). Inhibition of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 Enhances Temozolomide and Topotecan Activity against Childhood Neuroblastoma. Clinical Cancer Research. 15(4). 1241–1249. 61 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026