Young‐Bin Cho

19 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Young‐Bin Cho
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Radiation 158
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 118
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 62
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 81
  • Genetics 19
Replace Young-Bin Cho with:
Young-Bin Cho Canada
Adam Gladwish Canada
A.W. Sharfo Netherlands
Monica Serban Canada
Ans Swinnen Netherlands
Pittaya Dankulchai Thailand
Georgios Ioannidis Greece
Guoping Shan China
Daniela Smaniotto Italy
T. Coad Canada
Young‐Bin Cho relative to Young-Bin Cho Canada Young-Bin Cho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Young-Bin Cho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Young‐Bin Cho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Young‐Bin Cho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Young‐Bin Cho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Young‐Bin Cho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Young‐Bin Cho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Young‐Bin Cho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Young‐Bin Cho. The network helps show where Young‐Bin Cho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Young‐Bin Cho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Young‐Bin Cho Line = papers co-authored together Young‐Bin Cho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200994
2 200855
3 201041
4 200428
5 201323
6 201816
7 201012
8 201311
9 20098
10 20127
11 20237
12 20207
13 20255
14 20094
15 20233
16 20073
17 20222
18 20142
19 20231
20 20150

About Young‐Bin Cho

Young‐Bin Cho is a scholar working on Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery, having authored 20 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (13 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (2 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Internet of Things and Social Network Interactions (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (1 paper) and Management of metastatic bone disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (158 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (118 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (62 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (81 citations) and Genetics (19 citations). Young‐Bin Cho has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Fyles, Michael Milosevic, Jason Xie, Joanne Moseley, Karen Lim, H. Rehbinder, James Stewart, Kristy K. Brock, Valerie Kelly and J. Jezioranski. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Physics, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics and Physics in Medicine and Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact