Ying Jing
About
In The Last Decade
Ying Jing
3 papers receiving 344 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 270
- Artificial Intelligence 82
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 71
- Materials Chemistry 42
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 36
Countries citing papers authored by Ying Jing
This map shows the geographic impact of Ying Jing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ying Jing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ying Jing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ying Jing
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ying Jing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ying Jing. The network helps show where Ying Jing may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ying Jing
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ying Jing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ying Jing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ying Jing. Ying Jing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Modern Quantum Mechanics breakdown → | 351 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.