Y.E. van Kooij

526 total citations
19 papers, 222 citations indexed

About

Y.E. van Kooij is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology and Pharmacy. According to data from OpenAlex, Y.E. van Kooij has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 222 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Surgery, 8 papers in Epidemiology and 6 papers in Pharmacy. Recurrent topics in Y.E. van Kooij's work include Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (13 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (6 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (5 papers). Y.E. van Kooij is often cited by papers focused on Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (13 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (6 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (5 papers). Y.E. van Kooij collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Switzerland. Y.E. van Kooij's co-authors include Ruud W. Selles, Harm P. Slijper, Robbert M. Wouters, Reinier Feitz, Steven E.R. Hovius, Thybout M. Moojen, Guus M. Vermeulen, Ralph Poelstra, Mark J.W. van der Oest and Chao Zhou and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Y.E. van Kooij

14 papers receiving 220 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Y.E. van Kooij Netherlands 9 180 58 58 51 41 19 222
Ralph Poelstra Netherlands 9 144 0.8× 66 1.1× 47 0.8× 29 0.6× 25 0.6× 12 198
Robbert M. Wouters Netherlands 13 323 1.8× 48 0.8× 79 1.4× 102 2.0× 55 1.3× 36 406
Marek Trybus Poland 7 178 1.0× 43 0.7× 16 0.3× 33 0.6× 56 1.4× 28 280
Greg Packer United Kingdom 10 234 1.3× 80 1.4× 30 0.5× 96 1.9× 25 0.6× 33 309
Mike Szekeres Canada 11 211 1.2× 40 0.7× 22 0.4× 136 2.7× 9 0.2× 43 319
Ydo V. Kleinlugtenbelt Netherlands 10 273 1.5× 171 2.9× 12 0.2× 138 2.7× 36 0.9× 24 335
Wouter F. van Leeuwen United States 11 244 1.4× 61 1.1× 43 0.7× 133 2.6× 7 0.2× 19 272
Mihir J. Desai United States 12 262 1.5× 48 0.8× 20 0.3× 121 2.4× 11 0.3× 40 320
Tyler S. Pidgeon United States 10 221 1.2× 61 1.1× 23 0.4× 134 2.6× 11 0.3× 42 311
Beom Koo Lee South Korea 11 261 1.4× 42 0.7× 20 0.3× 28 0.5× 7 0.2× 20 354

Countries citing papers authored by Y.E. van Kooij

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Y.E. van Kooij's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Y.E. van Kooij with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Y.E. van Kooij more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Y.E. van Kooij

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Y.E. van Kooij. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Y.E. van Kooij. The network helps show where Y.E. van Kooij may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Y.E. van Kooij

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Y.E. van Kooij. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Y.E. van Kooij based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Y.E. van Kooij. Y.E. van Kooij is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
2.
Kooij, Y.E. van, et al.. (2025). How do clinicians use, experience, and value applications of outcome information in daily care? A mixed-methods study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 57. jrm42610–jrm42610.
3.
Kraan, Gerald, et al.. (2024). Diagnostic tests recommended for the clinical assessment of patients with wrist complaints, an e-Delphi study. Journal of Hand Therapy. 37(4). 591–600. 1 indexed citations
5.
Feitz, Reinier, Y.E. van Kooij, Mark J.W. van der Oest, et al.. (2023). Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Threshold for Successful Open Surgery of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex. Journal of Wrist Surgery. 13(4). 302–309.
6.
Kooij, Y.E. van, et al.. (2023). Factors associated with self-reported pain and hand function following dorsal wrist ganglion excision. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 48(6). 551–560.
7.
Kooij, Y.E. van, et al.. (2023). Explaining Personalized Activity Limitations in Patients With Hand and Wrist Disorders: Insights from Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Mindset Characteristics. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 105(2). 314–325. 2 indexed citations
8.
Kooij, Y.E. van, Harm P. Slijper, Joy C. MacDermid, et al.. (2023). Tailoring and Evaluating Treatment with the Patient-Specific Needs Evaluation: A Patient-Centered Approach. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 154(4). 787–799. 3 indexed citations
9.
Selles, Ruud W., et al.. (2023). Outcomes of an exercise program in patients with dorsal or volar midcarpal laxity: a cohort study of 213 patients. Disability and Rehabilitation. 46(9). 1825–1831. 2 indexed citations
10.
Kemler, Marius A., et al.. (2022). Dutch Multidisciplinary Guideline on Dupuytren Disease. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 5(2). 178–183. 2 indexed citations
11.
Kooij, Y.E. van, Ruud W. Selles, Harm P. Slijper, et al.. (2021). Determining the Minimally Important Change of the Michigan Hand outcomes Questionnaire in patients undergoing trigger finger release. Journal of Hand Therapy. 36(1). 139–147. 10 indexed citations
12.
Kooij, Y.E. van, et al.. (2021). Test-retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the Satisfaction with Treatment Result Questionnaire in Patients with Hand and Wrist Conditions: A Prospective Study. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 479(9). 2022–2032. 21 indexed citations
13.
Kooij, Y.E. van, Reinier Feitz, Caroline A. Hundepool, et al.. (2021). What Are the Minimally Important Changes of Four Commonly Used Patient-reported Outcome Measures for 36 Hand and Wrist Condition-Treatment Combinations?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 480(6). 1152–1166. 29 indexed citations
14.
Feitz, Reinier, Y.E. van Kooij, Mark J.W. van der Oest, et al.. (2021). Closing the loop: a 10-year experience with routine outcome measurements to improve treatment in hand surgery. EFORT Open Reviews. 6(6). 439–450. 17 indexed citations
15.
Kooij, Y.E. van, Ralph Poelstra, Jarry T. Porsius, et al.. (2020). Content validity and responsiveness of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale in patients with Dupuytren's disease. Journal of Hand Therapy. 34(3). 446–452. 9 indexed citations
16.
Selles, Ruud W., Robbert M. Wouters, Ralph Poelstra, et al.. (2020). Routine Health Outcome Measurement: Development, Design, and Implementation of the Hand and Wrist Cohort. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 146(2). 343–354. 65 indexed citations
17.
Poelstra, Ralph, Y.E. van Kooij, Mark J.W. van der Oest, et al.. (2019). Patient’s satisfaction beyond hand function in Dupuytren’s disease: analysis of 1106 patients. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 45(3). 280–285. 12 indexed citations
18.
Kooij, Y.E. van, et al.. (2017). The reliability and measurement error of protractor-based goniometry of the fingers: A systematic review. Journal of Hand Therapy. 30(4). 457–467. 22 indexed citations
19.
Zhou, Chao, Ruud W. Selles, Harm P. Slijper, et al.. (2016). Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Needle Aponeurotomy and Limited Fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s Contracture: A Multicenter Observational Study. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 138(4). 837–846. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026