Y. Nosyk

664 total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 438 citations indexed

About

Y. Nosyk is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Spectroscopy and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Y. Nosyk has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 438 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 4 papers in Spectroscopy and 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Y. Nosyk's work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (8 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (7 papers) and Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (4 papers). Y. Nosyk is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (8 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (7 papers) and Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (4 papers). Y. Nosyk collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and Germany. Y. Nosyk's co-authors include R. Machleidt, D. R. Entem, Norbert Kaiser, S. K. Saha and Francesca Sammarruca and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical review. C, Frontiers in Physics and Physical Review C.

In The Last Decade

Y. Nosyk

8 papers receiving 436 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

High-quality two-nucleon potentials up to fifth order of the chiral expansion

2017 220 citations D. R. Entem, R. Machleidt et al. Physical review. C profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Y. Nosyk United States	7	410	139	76	70	29	8	438
A. M. Gasparyan Germany	16	681 1.7×	116 0.8×	63 0.8×	39 0.6×	31 1.1×	32	706
J. Engel United States	4	413 1.0×	166 1.2×	63 0.8×	75 1.1×	24 0.8×	6	439
Sarah Wesolowski United States	6	403 1.0×	119 0.9×	59 0.8×	75 1.1×	12 0.4×	6	463
M. Rafalski Poland	9	304 0.7×	134 1.0×	88 1.2×	34 0.5×	32 1.1×	13	309
K. W. Topolnicki Poland	12	495 1.2×	196 1.4×	62 0.8×	42 0.6×	24 0.8×	48	504
T. Duguet France	8	404 1.0×	219 1.6×	115 1.5×	30 0.4×	41 1.4×	10	434
Simone Baroni Canada	7	264 0.6×	173 1.2×	37 0.5×	50 0.7×	28 1.0×	10	292
L. E. Marcucci Italy	7	354 0.9×	128 0.9×	44 0.6×	77 1.1×	32 1.1×	9	381
Klaus Vobig Germany	7	460 1.1×	261 1.9×	126 1.7×	29 0.4×	23 0.8×	9	483
S. P. Weppner United States	12	277 0.7×	125 0.9×	46 0.6×	23 0.3×	37 1.3×	22	296

Countries citing papers authored by Y. Nosyk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Y. Nosyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Y. Nosyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Y. Nosyk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Y. Nosyk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Y. Nosyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Y. Nosyk. The network helps show where Y. Nosyk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Y. Nosyk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Y. Nosyk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Y. Nosyk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Y. Nosyk. Y. Nosyk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Saha, S. K., D. R. Entem, R. Machleidt, & Y. Nosyk. (2023). Local position-space two-nucleon potentials from leading to fourth order of chiral effective field theory. Physical review. C. 107(3). 15 indexed citations

2.

Nosyk, Y., D. R. Entem, & R. Machleidt. (2021). Nucleon-nucleon potentials from Δ-full chiral effective-field-theory and implications. Physical review. C. 104(5). 16 indexed citations

3.

Entem, D. R., R. Machleidt, & Y. Nosyk. (2020). Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering Up to N5LO in Chiral Effective Field Theory. Frontiers in Physics. 8. 16 indexed citations

4.

Entem, D. R., R. Machleidt, & Y. Nosyk. (2017). High-quality two-nucleon potentials up to fifth order of the chiral expansion. Physical review. C. 96(2). 220 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Sammarruca, Francesca & Y. Nosyk. (2016). Impact of the neutron matter equation of state on neutron skins and neutron drip lines in chiral effective field theory. Physical review. C. 94(4). 6 indexed citations

6.

Nosyk, Y. & R. Machleidt. (2015). The Nucleon-Nucleon interaction in Chiral Effective Field Theory. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 1 indexed citations

7.

Entem, D. R., Norbert Kaiser, R. Machleidt, & Y. Nosyk. (2015). Dominant contributions to the nucleon-nucleon interaction at sixth order of chiral perturbation theory. Physical Review C. 92(6). 55 indexed citations

8.

Entem, D. R., Norbert Kaiser, R. Machleidt, & Y. Nosyk. (2015). Peripheral nucleon-nucleon scattering at fifth order of chiral perturbation theory. Physical Review C. 91(1). 109 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact