Xuewen Qiu
About
In The Last Decade
Xuewen Qiu
12 papers receiving 361 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Molecular Biology 222
- Molecular Medicine 120
- Food Science 80
- Microbiology 50
- Plant Science 50
Countries citing papers authored by Xuewen Qiu
This map shows the geographic impact of Xuewen Qiu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xuewen Qiu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xuewen Qiu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Xuewen Qiu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xuewen Qiu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xuewen Qiu. The network helps show where Xuewen Qiu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Xuewen Qiu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Xuewen Qiu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Xuewen Qiu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Xuewen Qiu. Xuewen Qiu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 37 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 216 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | [Population pharmacokinetics research of clozapine in Chinese schizophrenic patients]. | 8 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.