Xin‐Feng Li
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Li‐Yang DaiZude LiuLin‐Yu JinXiao‐Xing SongLie QianGuibin ZhongSheng ShiXiaohong Chen
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (25 papers)Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (20 papers)Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Xin‐Feng Li
62 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 790
- Surgery 737
- Molecular Biology 233
- Pharmacology 167
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 98
Countries citing papers authored by Xin‐Feng Li
This map shows the geographic impact of Xin‐Feng Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xin‐Feng Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xin‐Feng Li more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Xin‐Feng Li
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xin‐Feng Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xin‐Feng Li. The network helps show where Xin‐Feng Li may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Xin‐Feng Li
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Xin‐Feng Li. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Xin‐Feng Li based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Xin‐Feng Li. Xin‐Feng Li is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | Blood–Spinal Cord Barrier in Spinal Cord Injury: A Reviewbreakdown → | 169 |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 52 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | Evaluation of TACE combined with RFA and PEI in treating advanced hepatic carcinoma | 3 |
| 20 | Development of finite element model for the scoliotic spine and its parameters optimization | 3 |
About Xin‐Feng Li
Xin‐Feng Li is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (25 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (20 papers) and Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (790 citations), Surgery (737 citations) and Pharmacology (167 citations). Xin‐Feng Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Li‐Yang Dai, Zude Liu, Lin‐Yu Jin, Xiao‐Xing Song, Lie Qian, Guibin Zhong, Sheng Shi, Xiaohong Chen, Hua Lu and Chunru Wang. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Clinical Cancer Research and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.