Xiaoyi Ding

1.8k citations
66 papers · 999 indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaoyi Ding

63 papers receiving 990 citations

Peers

Xiaoyi Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Rheumatology 224
  • Health Informatics 18
  • Oral Surgery 96
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 293
  • Cancer Research 120
Replace Kurt R. Weiss with:
Kurt R. Weiss United States
Satoshi Kano Japan
Shuichi Kawashiri Japan
Daniela Russo Italy
Zhenhua Gao China
Ying Yuan China
Barış Karakullukçu Netherlands
Kristian Ikenberg Switzerland
O. Hans Iwenofu United States
Mitsuo Goto Japan
Xiaoyi Ding relative to Kurt R. Weiss United States Kurt R. Weiss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kurt R. Weiss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaoyi Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaoyi Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaoyi Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaoyi Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaoyi Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaoyi Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaoyi Ding. The network helps show where Xiaoyi Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaoyi Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaoyi Ding Line = papers co-authored together Xiaoyi Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019129
2 200970
3 202356
4 202053
5 201349
6 201936
7 201331
8 201726
9 202125
10 201224
11 202223
12 201923
13 201421
14 201821
15 202120
16 201619
17 201318
18 201718
19 201917
20 202117

About Xiaoyi Ding

Xiaoyi Ding is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rheumatology, Molecular Biology, Surgery and Oral Surgery, having authored 66 papers that have together received 999 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (18 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (15 papers), Musculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments (12 papers), Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (9 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (6 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (4 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (4 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (224 citations), Health Informatics (18 citations), Oral Surgery (96 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (293 citations) and Cancer Research (120 citations). Xiaoyi Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Zhongmin Wang, Zhiyuan Wu, Chengsheng Wang, Lianjun Du, Qingbing Wang, Fei Yuan, Yu Zhou, Yong Lü, Yifeng He and Wenxi Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as La radiologia medica, Frontiers in Oncology, European Journal of Radiology, European Radiology and Journal of Materials Chemistry B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact