Xia Yang

947 citations
48 papers · 815 indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Xia Yang

45 papers receiving 801 citations

Peers

Xia Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Molecular Medicine 181
  • Biomaterials 208
  • Pharmaceutical Science 77
  • Environmental Chemistry 89
  • Biomedical Engineering 267
Replace Ching‐An Peng with:
Ching‐An Peng United States
Zhongguang Yang Hong Kong
Laying Wu United States
Fanyi Li Australia
Yannic Ramaye Germany
Xilong Wu China
А. В. Добродумов Russia
Rong Zhou China
Xia Yang relative to Ching‐An Peng United States Ching‐An Peng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Ching‐An Peng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xia Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xia Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xia Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xia Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xia Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xia Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xia Yang. The network helps show where Xia Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xia Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xia Yang Line = papers co-authored together Xia Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200993
2 202085
3 201360
4 201051
5 201451
6 200446
7 201743
8 201129
9 201426
10 201326
11 201923
12 201122
13 200922
14 201022
15 201720
16 201020
17 200820
18 201819
19 201814
20 202511

About Xia Yang

Xia Yang is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Organic Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 815 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications (14 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (12 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (5 papers), Antimicrobial agents and applications (5 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (4 papers), Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (4 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (4 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (181 citations), Biomaterials (208 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (77 citations), Environmental Chemistry (89 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (267 citations). Xia Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Sweden and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Dmitri Ossipov, Jin‐Chul Kim, Jöns Hilborn, Sujit Kootala, Lili Yang, Xingqiang Wu, Arend Heerschap, Xiaoguo Chen, Bangding Xiao and Yi Sun. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Carbohydrate Polymers, ACS Applied Bio Materials, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces and Macromolecular Bioscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact