Worrapong Kit‐Anan
About
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Worrapong Kit‐Anan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Worrapong Kit‐Anan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Worrapong Kit‐Anan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Worrapong Kit‐Anan. Worrapong Kit‐Anan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Worrapong Kit‐Anan
13 papers receiving 451 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Worrapong Kit‐Anan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Worrapong Kit‐Anan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Worrapong Kit‐Anan. The network helps show where Worrapong Kit‐Anan may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Worrapong Kit‐Anan
This map shows the geographic impact of Worrapong Kit‐Anan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Worrapong Kit‐Anan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Worrapong Kit‐Anan more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.